A Media Guide for new "Personalized Number Plates" stories

Quick Links:

We here at BCpl8s.ca appreciate when the major media outlets in the province take an interest in license plates and put resources into running a story on them. Often, this results in the publication of information that we have been unsuccessful in prying loose from the Corporation ourselves, and also exposes the world of license plates to a much broader audience.
That said, we are concerned that media coverage of license plates over the past few years has become somewhat repetitive and predictable. Namely, the tendency to re-visit stories on personalized license plates and the slogans that ICBC has been rejecting.
A classic case in point (and the one which drove us to create this page) is a 2016 segment by Global News entitled "Squire's take on vanity license plates":

As can be seen in the following assortment of headlines (some of which are still active links), "Squire's take" was not that original and treaded over some very familiar ground that the print media has covered numerous times since 2007:
1981 - Maclean's
ABOVE: The granddaddy of BC personalised plate stories! This is included more out of historical interest than anything else ...
2007 - Vancouver Sun
2009 - Vancouver Province
2011 - New 1130
2013 - Canadian Taxpayers Federation
2014 - Vancouver Sun
Rejected Slogans

We would like to thank the good folks at ICBC for sharing with us their lists of rejected personalised licence plate slogans. A word of caution for the easily offended, there may be some words in these lists that you may find, well ... offensive. But what kind of an "offensive" slogan lists would they be if they didn't offend?

Now, we understand the disruptive nature that the internet is having on so-called "legacy media" companies and the pressure this is putting on budgets for investigative reporting. So, in our own little way, we would like to help-out by offering some suggestions for any reporter thinking of running a future story on personalised license plates in BC and who might be looking for a new angle for their story.

Alternate Story Suggestion No. 1: Why are personalized plates so unpopular in BC?
Lets start with the statement made by ICBC Spokesman Sam Corea in "Squire's take" that "on our roads right now we have 15,000 plates, so it's a popular program [emphasis added]..."
This is patently false. The number of personalised plates in British Columbia has been stalled at 15,000 since the 1980s, and when growth in vehicle ownership numbers over the past 30 years is taken into account, the program has actually declined precipitously in popularity.
How much has it declined? Well, available data indicates that there were 1,640,895 vehicles registered in 1984 versus 3,373,000 in 2014. By our estimate, that's an increase of 105.6% in registered vehicles, but a decline in the popularity of personalized license plates by -47%.
Another way to look at it is 15,000 personalized license plates in 1984 would have been 0.91% of all registered vehicles in the province, whereas by 2014 the number would be a mere 0.44% of all eligible vehicles.
How unusual is this number? Consider that a 2005 study found that the US average was 3.83%, while in 2006 Stats Canada reported the Canadian average to be 2.94%. The state with the highest number of personalized plates in 2007 was Virginia at 16.19% while the province with the most personalized plates was Ontario at 4.59%.
Even more damning, in 2007 British Columbia ranked second last at 0.59%, only slightly ahead of Texas' 0.56% in terms of percentage of vehicles with vanity license plates. In the intervening decade, British Columbia has slipped further to only 0.44% while Texas revolutionized its vanity plate program and is now seen as one of the most innovative jurisdictions for vanity plates on the continent.
After finishing dead last in a survey of vanity license plates in North America conducted by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) in 2007, Texas privatised is vanity/specialty license plate program. The new vendor, MyPlates (an Australian company), overhauled the entire system brining in such obvious customer service improvements as on-line ordering and checking of slogan availability, new designs, auctions, 7 character slogans and variable pricing! Just check out that snazzy web page they have (at left)!
One of the main reasons behind the failure of the personalized license plate program has been its mis-management by the provincial government.
The original purpose of the PNP Program was to raise funds for the provincial government, yet, the government takes all the monies generated for the program and places it into general revenues (for use on other priorities such as health and education).
Consequently, the Corporation is left with no funds to promote or invest in the PNP Program, and is further presented with a very strong disincentive to raise funds to do so as this would require an increase to basic rates (which is politically unpopular) while any additional monies generated through better marketing or innovative options would simply be scooped up by the provincial government. Consequently, the PNP Program has been left to languish.
Not all is lost, however ... the previous popularity of the Olympic specialty plate (2007-12) seems to suggest that there is a pent up demand for more creative ways to express oneself on a license plate and, when properly managed and funded, British Columbia driver's have responded.

Alternate Story Suggestion No. 2: Who are the vainest drivers in BC?
A simple yet high impact story; who are the vainest drives in the province? Could it be Vancouverites? Maybe Victorians? Is there a black horse lurking out in the Kootenay's somewhere (Nelson or Castlegar)?
The Corporation maintains data on types of license plates issued by community (see the data they released in 2016 in relation to Collector plates which was used to proclaim Langley the hot rod capital of the province) and while we here at BCpl8s.ca have made a request for this in relation to personalized license plates, ICBC has informed us that this would take a while to prepare and they are back-logged with other requests.
Possibly one of the main media companies might have more success prying this information lose (you have in the past!).

Alternate Story Suggestion No. 3: Should ICBC be censoring plates?
As was seen in the headlines posted above, most features on personalized license plates over the past decade have focused on the censorship actions of the Corporation - but only on a superficial level. For instance, the media has never asked if ICBC's actions in dispatching hundreds of slogans a year are consistent or legal.
In one of the finest pieces of reporting we have ever seen on a personalized license plate program, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Colorado obtained records from the state DMV for approved as well as rejected slogans in that state and did a comparison. The results speak for themselves:
Approved
Rejected
Other inconsistencies, not pictured, included "TOPLE55" being turned down, but "TOPLESS" being approved. Similarly, "GANJA" was denied, but "PEYOTEwas approved. To read more about the ACLU of Colorado's investigation; Click Here!
Taking inspiration from this approach, new story option No. 3(a) would be to ask the Corporation for a list of those slogans approved between 1987 to 2016 (keeping in mind the rejected slogans for these years are already posted above) and do a simple comparison to see what might reveal itself.
There are enough fans of the classic Seinfeld episode "The Fusilli Jerry" (S6:E21 - 1995-04-27) that ICBC has had to reject the "ASSMAN" slogan on at least three separate occasions (if not more). Despite being denied on the basis that it is "offensive" and "suggestive" the Corporation appears to have had no qualms allowing "MR BUTT" which, to us here at BCpl8s.ca is a tautology of "ASSMAN" - is it not?

In the 2014 Vancouver Sun column "4 PLAY the most commonly rejected vanity plate in B.C." reference is made to the slogan "NEWFIE" being rejected a dozen different times between 1987 and 2013. Well, cast your eyes on the plate below! In additon, the column included a number of mock-ups of other rejected slogans, including "TOPLES". Well, well ...
Image Credit: Vancouver Sun
Image Credit: FunkyPlates.com

Pictured above is the plate "NEWF E", which is apparently acceptable to ICBC as a slogan whereas the more correct spelling of "NEWFIE" has been rejected a dozen times between 1987 and 2013.

At top-right is a graphic produced by the Vancouver Sun of the slogan "TOPLES" in 2014 to illustrate a slogan rejected by ICBC. Below is the actual plate "TOPLES" which was issued by ICBC despite being deemed an offensive slogan. Why the change in heart at the Corportation is unknown ...

IMAGE CREDIT: "TOPLESS" (bottom) from FunkyPlates.com

New story No. 3(b) would be to see if ICBC's censors are acting within their mandate. For instance, ICBC's authority to perform its censorship role is drawn directly from Sections 34.04(d) & (e) of the Motor Vehicle Act Regulations, specifically.
The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia shall not issue a personalized number plate that would contain:
(d) characters in a combination that, in the opinion of the corporation, is unseemly, vulgar, indecent or may offend any person, or
(e) characters that, in the opinion of the corporation, might distract the drivers of other vehicles so as to reduce the level of their driving care or attention.
Recall that in "Squire's take", ICBC Spokesperson Sam Corea ran through the common categories that the Corporation relies on when rejecting slogans, including "03" which is for offensive slogans, "04" for suggestive slogans, "05" for slogans not in good taste, "09" for slogans related to alcohol or drugs and "13" which is for speed or racing slogans (the full list can be accessed; HERE).
Generally, these categories can be linked back to Section 34.04(d), but in what alternate universe are speed and racing slogans deemed "offensive" to anyone other than an insurance agent working for the Corporation?
We believe that any suggestion that speed racing slogans "might distract the drivers of other vehicles" strains credulity, and highlights a more worrisome question; what else has ICBC deemed "offensive" simply because it might conflict with its corporate mandate?
While ICBC may consider it perfectly normal to reject "NSCR 3" (a reference to the late Dale Earnhardt) three times (naturally) in 2011, "RPM RCN" and "SMOKE" (really ICBC, "SMOKE"?!?!) on the basis that they are speed related and therefore "offensive", a number of US states not only allow such slogans (see the Mississippi Earnhardt No. 3, Texas "VROOOM" and New York "RPM" plates at left) they also directly promote NASCAR and racing scenes on specialty license plate bases. All, apparently, without anyone being offended or any discernible impact on road safety in these jurisdictions.

Recent media reports have also failed to delve into the system ICBC uses to vet license plate slogans. It might surprise people to know that decisions regarding all slogans are generally made by a single staff member sitting in front of a computer screen punching combinations into the Urban Dictionary, the Corporation's own in-house database while also reading the tea leaves at the bottom of their coffee cup (on that last one, I am kidding - kinda).

Unlike other jurisdictions, the Corporation does not rely on a committee with representation from outside the organisation, nor does it produce its list of banned slogans so people might know what not to waste their time on. Of even more interest, has anyone ever appealed to the Corporation's Fairness Commission regarding a rejected slogan and how are those cases handled?


In fairness, we do want to credit CTV Vancouver for taking up the cause of Dr David Hersh, a sex therapist, in November of 2010 when he went public with his complaint about ICBC determining that his request to have the slogan "DR SEX" on his plate "might be offensive to some people".
The broadcaster went to so far as to create its own mock-up of Hersh's requested "DR SEX" slogan and proceeded to ask people in it "Voice on the Street" segment - essentially challenging the Corporation's assumptions regarding where community values and sensibilities might lie on this slogan!
We'll excuse CTV News for using the regular passenger base for their mock-up and not the PNP base!
 
Dr David Hersh reading the rejection letter sent to him by ICBC advising that he would not be receiving his "DR SEX" slogan.
In media reports, Hersh stated that ICBC was being ridiculous and that "this opinion has to do with morality. They talk about reducing drivers' level of attention and care because they see the word 'sex' on a licence plate. Well, we've seen lingerie ads on the freeways". He further offered that he was "offended by the morality and the Victorian attitudes, so frightened of the word sex". He also pointed out that "there is a guy here in town who is a dentist and his licence plate is '2TH DOC' - tooth doc. So why is his part of the body OK and mine is not OK?"

Even more exciting, Hersh announced that he would be engaging the services of a lawyer to press his case with the censors at ICBC - which would have been fantastic had he actually followed through on it, as it is our understanding that the Corporation's censoring activities with regard to plate slogans have never been tested in court (especially as they relate to "speed racing" terminology which is probably only offensive to ICBC as a public insurer. Alas, nothing more was heard from Mr Hersh on this subject ...
POSTSCRIPT: It would seem proclaiming that you are a Sex Doctor on your license plate in Missouri, while not a slam dunk, can be successful upon appeal! In 2013, the Show-Me state had to contend with a very similar application to that made by David Hersh in BC, albeit for a slightly different iteration of "SEX DOC". And, lo and behold, the plate was approved following an administrative tribunal attended by lawyers on both sides. Important in a Canadian legal context, New Brunswick lost a case in 2016 in which it attempted to revoke personalized plates that displayed the slogan "DUI DR" on the basis that their actions breached basic procedural fairness and was unreasonable because there was no evidence presented to provide a basis for the decision. We find this last part of the decision of particular interest in the context of how ICBC chooses to make its decisions. For instance, does reference to an arbitrary code (i.e. "13" for speed racing) provide a reasonable basis for a decision?

Quick Links:

HOME : BCpl8s.ca

© Copyright Christopher John Garrish. All rights reserved.